Train with coding assistants like Magnus Carlsen trains with chess engines
2025-10-31
![]()
The author argues that developers should use AI coding assistants the way Magnus Carlsen uses chess engines—not as autopilot but as a learning tool through rigorous post-game analysis. Rather than accepting LLM-generated code directly, developers should review it critically during code review to understand why solutions work and catch mistakes, shifting the time investment from coding to learning-focused review. The effectiveness of this approach depends entirely on whether the developer engages thoughtfully with the AI's output or blindly accepts it without comprehension.
Was this useful?