QFM040: Irresponsible AI Reading List October 2024
Everything that I found interesting last month about the irresponsible use of AI.
Tags: qfm, irresponsible, ai, reading, list, october, 2024
Source: Photo by Joel Durkee on Unsplash
The October edition of the Irresponsible AI Reading List explores the sometimes overstated expectations of AI’s capabilities, against real-world limitations and ethical concerns. Opening with The Optimus robots at Tesla’s Cybercab event were humans in disguise, we see how Tesla’s ambitious portrayal of humanoid robots mingling autonomously at an event masked the reality of human control behind the scenes. This highlights the gap between marketing spectacle and technological maturity, a recurring theme in recent AI hype.
In a similar vein, Sorry, GenAI is NOT going to 10x computer programming delves into the notion that generative AI is far from revolutionising coding productivity as promised. Gary Marcus critiques the popular notion of “10x programming,” presenting evidence that AI-driven tools offer limited productivity gains, often falling short in areas requiring deep understanding. This critique of inflated promises is reinforced by More on why AI is not going to take over your whole software product, where a developer underscores AI’s inability to manage complex, context-heavy tasks like API type management, reminding us that human expertise remains crucial in nuanced software development.
Elsewhere, the limitations of AI’s role in interpersonal communication are illustrated in AI-Powered Breakup: Man Learns He’s Being Dumped via Dystopian AI, where an AI-generated message conveys a breakup through Apple’s upcoming summarisation tool. The incident raises ethical questions around the emotional impact of AI-mediated messages and signals how AI could disrupt personal interactions as it becomes embedded in daily life.
Finally, A bold prediction on the future of AI adds a perspective on the economic boundaries AI may face in the future, considering growth limits, profitability, and cost. The discussions surrounding these predictions serve as a grounded counterpoint to the idealistic promises of AI transforming industries wholesale.
As always, the Quantum Fax Machine Propellor Hat Key will guide your browsing. Enjoy!
The Optimus robots at Tesla’s Cybercab event were humans in disguise: Tesla’s recent Cybercab event prominently featured its Optimus humanoid robots, showcasing their interactions with attendees, from mingling in the crowd to serving drinks. However, it was later revealed that these robots required human assistance and were not acting autonomously. Attendees noted the immediate responses and varying voices, suggesting human control. The event highlighted Tesla’s flair for showmanship, but offered little insight into the true progress of their humanoid robotics.
#Tesla #HumanoidRobots #Cybercab #TechEvent #FutureofRobotics
AI-Powered Breakup: Man Learns He’s Being Dumped via Dystopian AI: A software developer from NYC, Nick Spreen, received an AI-generated message summarizing breakup texts from his girlfriend, which indicated the end of their relationship. The message was delivered through a test version of Apple’s upcoming AI feature, which summarizes text messages. The incident, shared via social media, went viral and raised discussions on the emotional impact of receiving news through AI summaries. This situation exemplifies how AI could increasingly mediate interpersonal communications in the future.
#AI #Apple #TechNews #Breakup #EmotionalIntelligence
A bold prediction on the future of AI: Danny Thompson shares a video featuring a “bold” prediction on the future of AI by Gianluca Mauro, who has a decade of experience in AI and teaches at Harvard. The prediction, which Thompson finds intriguing and potentially agreeable, sparks a conversation on the possible trajectory of AI, specifically on the topics of AI costs, profitability, and growth limits, as seen in the comments.
#AIfuture #AIPredictions #TechIndustry #ArtificialIntelligence #AIeconomics
Sorry, GenAI is NOT going to 10x computer programming: This article by Gary Marcus discusses the overstated potential of Generative AI (GenAI) to increase programming productivity tenfold. Marcus argues against the hype, presenting data from studies that reveal only modest improvements, such as a 26% productivity increase for junior developers and slight gains for senior developers. The piece highlights issues like increased bug prevalence and the need for deep conceptual understanding which GenAI lacks.
#GenerativeAI #Coding #TechHype #Productivity #AIResearch
More on why AI is not going to take over your whole software product: In this post, the author, a seasoned software developer, criticises claims that AI can fully replace human expertise in complex software tasks. They share a real-world example involving type management in an API, showing how LLMs are far from capable of handling intricate, nuanced tasks that require context and problem-solving skills. The author argues that such claims are misleading, as current AI cannot effectively manage tasks like updating SDKs or understanding dependencies, underscoring the need for human expertise in software development.
#AImyths #SoftwareEngineering #HumanExpertise #LLMlimitations #APIdesign
Regards,
[ED: If you’d like to sign up for this content as an email, click here to join the mailing list.]
Originally published on quantumfaxmachine.com and cross-posted on Medium.